Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by MysticPing Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:53 am
We invite Segerliner and Kahlawian Ambassadors to a summit in the de-militarized island of Thoria. Where we will re-negotiate the treaty of Albemuth.
Our initial proposal:
As it was not the current government's crime we suggest the treaty should end completely, in return we may join your alliance, and agree not to leave, whatever happens for at least 4 years.
Our initial proposal:
As it was not the current government's crime we suggest the treaty should end completely, in return we may join your alliance, and agree not to leave, whatever happens for at least 4 years.
MysticPing- Posts : 767
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 25
Location : Sweden
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by Guest Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:54 am
Segerline will attend, and will draft up a proper treaty and try to lay aside our differences.
Guest- Guest
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by borisperrons Sun Nov 16, 2014 6:03 pm
The DRK agrees on meeting to renegotiate the treaty and to discuss the UK admission to the DEPS.
borisperrons- Posts : 912
Join date : 2014-05-23
Location : In a teather near you
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by MysticPing Sun Nov 16, 2014 6:48 pm
With all members here, the meeting is declared opened.
"Hello and welcome! We all know why we are here today, so let's get this started"
Our proposal is this:
All parts of the treaty will be put out of effect. Not including 2.1, which will be lowered to 25 mk per cycle. For the remaining 1 year, per the treaty (Or is it more cycles left, dont know?)
In return we will join the DEPS on a agreement to not leave, whatever happens for 4 years, then if nothing happened we will stay in it.
We can also agree to continue to place a limitation of our army, albeit less restrictive. The Radio Kahlawia will continue to be allowed to be broadcasted in our lands, but never forced.
We think this is fair, because we have followed the treaty completely, and the crimes were not of our current regime.
"Hello and welcome! We all know why we are here today, so let's get this started"
Our proposal is this:
All parts of the treaty will be put out of effect. Not including 2.1, which will be lowered to 25 mk per cycle. For the remaining 1 year, per the treaty (Or is it more cycles left, dont know?)
In return we will join the DEPS on a agreement to not leave, whatever happens for 4 years, then if nothing happened we will stay in it.
We can also agree to continue to place a limitation of our army, albeit less restrictive. The Radio Kahlawia will continue to be allowed to be broadcasted in our lands, but never forced.
We think this is fair, because we have followed the treaty completely, and the crimes were not of our current regime.
MysticPing- Posts : 767
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 25
Location : Sweden
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by borisperrons Sun Nov 16, 2014 9:40 pm
That's something we can work on. We understand that the government has changed since last time (although in some suspicious way) and we have to say, seems to have changed for the better. I'd like to point out that if our relations are to be normalized and for us to come to a peaceful coexistence, total trasparency on security and political matters is a must have, to avoid dangerous paranoia.
borisperrons- Posts : 912
Join date : 2014-05-23
Location : In a teather near you
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by The Cobbler Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:13 pm
Camponja would like to suggest any transparancy to be mutual; peace can only be built on bipartisan trust, of course, and otherwise Kahlawia and Segerline may still be viewed as the oppressors of this now-free state.
Otherwise, both sides should be allowed to operate without a watchful eye.
Otherwise, both sides should be allowed to operate without a watchful eye.
The Cobbler- Posts : 512
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 26
Location : Netherlands
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by Guest Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:14 pm
Segerline would like to remind Camponja that it is non of your buisness what we discuss during this congress. However we plan this to be transparent if all parties agree.
Guest- Guest
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by The Cobbler Sun Nov 16, 2014 10:52 pm
There is no need for such a harsh tone; we were just providing our two cents
The Cobbler- Posts : 512
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 26
Location : Netherlands
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by borisperrons Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:52 pm
The terms being discussed here are to be discussed between the signatories of the Treaty of Albemuth, at the terms pointed out in it. We ask third parties to abstain from unnecessary comments.
borisperrons- Posts : 912
Join date : 2014-05-23
Location : In a teather near you
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by MysticPing Mon Nov 17, 2014 4:16 pm
What is your opinion of this proposed solution, Segerliner?
MysticPing- Posts : 767
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 25
Location : Sweden
Guest- Guest
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by MysticPing Wed Nov 19, 2014 6:19 pm
Should we write up a proper treaty then?
(You can do this please)
(You can do this please)
MysticPing- Posts : 767
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 25
Location : Sweden
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by borisperrons Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:34 pm
This is our treaty proposal:
- Spoiler:
- Of DEPS membership:
1- The UK will join the DEPS as an Outer Sphere member, and will follow the DEPS charter as any other member;
2- The UK will join the DEPS Defence Joint Plan, accepting his role in the common military policy;
3- Both the DRK and the FSRS will not abuse of their powers on the UK.
Of economical reparations:
1- The UK will continue paying the war reparations as stated in the Treaty of Albemuth;
2- Both the DRK and FSRS will use the remaining reparations to improve the technological level of all the DEPS.
Of military issues:
1- The military limitations on the UK will be reworked after a joint meeting of the DEPS Joint Defence Commission;
2- The UK will take part in exercises and military operations alongside the other DEPS members, as stated by the DEPS charter;
3- The UK will undisclose all its special weapons programs and stockpiles to the Inner Sphere members;
4- Both the DRK and FSRS will continue their military protection of he UK.
borisperrons- Posts : 912
Join date : 2014-05-23
Location : In a teather near you
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by MysticPing Wed Nov 26, 2014 10:01 am
- Spoiler:
- Of DEPS membership:
1- The UK will join the DEPS as an Outer Sphere member, and will follow the DEPS charter as any other member;
2- The UK will join the DEPS Defence Joint Plan, accepting his role in the common military policy;
3- Both the DRK and the FSRS will not abuse of their powers on the UK.
Of economical reparations:1- The UK will continue paying the war reparations as stated in the Treaty of Albemuth;We cannot agree this, we want to lower the payments to 15 mk a cycle, to allow us to focus more on peaceful activities.
2- Both the DRK and FSRS will use the remaining reparations to improve the technological level of all the DEPS.
Of military issues:
1- The military limitations on the UK will be reworked after a joint meeting of the DEPS Joint Defence Commission;
2- The UK will take part in exercises and military operations alongside the other DEPS members, as stated by the DEPS charter;
3- The UK will undisclose all its special weapons programs and stockpiles to the Inner Sphere members;
4- Both the DRK and FSRS will continue their military protection of he UK.
We also assume that this means that the rest of the treaty will be nulled, are we right?
MysticPing- Posts : 767
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 25
Location : Sweden
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by borisperrons Wed Nov 26, 2014 12:09 pm
The economical reparations are a non negotiable point. We might agree to lower the cyclic fee, but the total amount to be paid cannot be modified.
As for the rest of the treaty, point 1 (Of territorial changes) will stand in place, and point 3 (Of control and surveillance) will be de facto voided since by joining the DEPS you'll implicitly agree to DEPS controls over military and space matters, and that the new treaty specifically mentions special weapons control.
As for the rest of the treaty, point 1 (Of territorial changes) will stand in place, and point 3 (Of control and surveillance) will be de facto voided since by joining the DEPS you'll implicitly agree to DEPS controls over military and space matters, and that the new treaty specifically mentions special weapons control.
borisperrons- Posts : 912
Join date : 2014-05-23
Location : In a teather near you
Re: Regotiation of the Treaty of Albemuth
by MysticPing Wed Nov 26, 2014 1:13 pm
The reperations were too large to begin with anyway, all it has done is stop us from advancing scientifically. But very well we can agree.
(Have i not payed the last payment anyway, been 10 cycles, let's do the military discussion later then?)
(Have i not payed the last payment anyway, been 10 cycles, let's do the military discussion later then?)
MysticPing- Posts : 767
Join date : 2014-05-23
Age : 25
Location : Sweden
Similar topics» The Treaty of Albemuth
» Albemuth Peace Negotiations
» The treaty of Turan
» The Treaty of Busan
» The North Sea Treaty
» Albemuth Peace Negotiations
» The treaty of Turan
» The Treaty of Busan
» The North Sea Treaty
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|